Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { ?s ?p "Horne v. United States Department of Agriculture, No. 12-123, 569 U.S. ___ (2013); No. 14-275, 576 U.S. ___ (2015) are a pair of United States Supreme Court cases in which the Court established that the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to personal property. The cases arose out of a dispute involving the National Raisin Reserve, when a farmer challenged a rule that required farmers to keep a portion of their crops off the market. In Horne I the Court held that the plaintiff had standing to sue for violation of the United States Constitution’s takings clause. In Horne II the Court held that the National Raisin Reserve was an unconstitutional violation of the takings clause."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- Horne_v._Department_of_Agriculture abstract "Horne v. United States Department of Agriculture, No. 12-123, 569 U.S. ___ (2013); No. 14-275, 576 U.S. ___ (2015) are a pair of United States Supreme Court cases in which the Court established that the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to personal property. The cases arose out of a dispute involving the National Raisin Reserve, when a farmer challenged a rule that required farmers to keep a portion of their crops off the market. In Horne I the Court held that the plaintiff had standing to sue for violation of the United States Constitution’s takings clause. In Horne II the Court held that the National Raisin Reserve was an unconstitutional violation of the takings clause.".