Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { ?s ?p "Harris v. Quinn, 573 U.S. ___ (2014), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court regarding provisions of Illinois' state law that allowed a union security agreement. Since the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 prohibited the closed shop, states could still choose whether to allow unions to collect fees from non-union members on the ground that the collective agreements with the employer would still benefit non-union members. Five judges to four held that Illinois' Public Labor Relations Act which permitted union security agreements violated the First Amendment. The dissenting judges found no such violation."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- Harris_v._Quinn abstract "Harris v. Quinn, 573 U.S. ___ (2014), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court regarding provisions of Illinois' state law that allowed a union security agreement. Since the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 prohibited the closed shop, states could still choose whether to allow unions to collect fees from non-union members on the ground that the collective agreements with the employer would still benefit non-union members. Five judges to four held that Illinois' Public Labor Relations Act which permitted union security agreements violated the First Amendment. The dissenting judges found no such violation.".